问题： 为什么我的论文第二轮审稿时间特别长？

我在 1 月 19 号的时候投稿给 Elsevier 期刊，在 2 月 15 日的时候收到审稿意见。审稿人的意见是： Reviewer 1 appreciated the work and said that  it is of potential interest for many useers.He had only a few very minor comments, which could be even addressed at the proofreading stage: one suggested adding a reference, the second required splitting a table, and the last one asked to make a database in our work available for public. Reviewer 2 pointed out a few errors and asked me to explain some unclear areas in the work, and asked me to change a caption of a figure and to make the database available as the first reviewer had. 虽然我认为审稿人的意见是小修，但编辑的决定是大修，让我 6 周内返修。我根据审稿意见一一进行回复跟修改，在第 4 周也就是 3 月 14 日的时候重投了。我以为会很快就收到接受通知的，但论文卡在 with editor 好长一段时间，比一审的时候还长。于是我发邮件询问编辑是怎么回事，结果状态在一个小时之后就变成了 under review。这个期刊从修改到接收的平均时间是 13 天，但我的论文已经超过 45 天了，难道是要被拒了吗？